Home » Wit of Mandate – Blog » No Such Thing as an Unregistered Veterinary Technician

No Such Thing as an Unregistered Veterinary Technician

A couple years ago, we published blog post entitled, “Veterinary Medical Board Taboo: ‘Veterinary Technician.’” (http://simasgovlaw.com/media/blog/veterinary_technician/) In that, we discussed Business and Professions Code section 4893.5 which states:

No person shall use the title “registered veterinary technician” or “veterinary technician,” or any other words, letters, or symbols, including, but not limited to, the abbreviation “R.V.T.,” with the intent to represent that the person is authorized to act as a registered veterinary technician, unless that person meets the requirements of Section 4839.

This code section became effective January 1, 2011, and yet we still see so much misuse of the title by veterinarians and by the people claiming to be “technicians” themselves, despite the risk of disciplinary action by the Veterinary Medical Board (“Board”).

Section 2034 of Article 4 of Division 20 of the California Code of Regulations, defines an “R.V.T.” as a “registered veterinary technician certified by the Board.”  A person who is not an R.V.T. is an “unregistered assistant.” These titles delineate the authority granted to the person by the Board, and the differentiate the types of tasks each position is legally allowed to perform.

Tasks for Unregistered Assistants

Under section 2036.5 of the California Code of Regulations, an unregistered assistant is prohibited from performing surgery, diagnosis and prognosis of animal diseases, or proscribing drugs, medicines or appliances. An unregistered assistant may administer a controlled substance, but only under the direct supervision of a licensed veterinarian or registered technician. In addition, unregistered assistants may perform “auxiliary animal health care tasks,” under the direct or indirect supervision of a licensed veterinarian or the direct supervision of an R.V.T.

“Auxiliary animal health care tasks” is not defined in the regulations, but the Board has explicitly stated unregistered assistants are allowed to perform micro-chipping and rabies vaccination administration under the above specified supervision.

To avoid unlicensed practice violations, you should speak to an attorney at Simas & Associates, Ltd. regarding staff titles, duties, and job descriptions.

Share this:Share on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someonePrint this page


Wit of Mandate Disclaimer

Wit of Mandate - the official blog of Simas & Associates, Ltd., is made available by Simas & Associates, Ltd. to the general public for educational purposes only.  Specifically, the entries contained within Wit of Mandate are designed to provide the general public with general information concerning California and Federal law.  Wit of Mandate does not provide specific legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and Simas & Associates, Ltd.  Wit of Mandate is not an effective or appropriate substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state with experience in your practice area or forum of law.

Please note that the information on Wit of Mandate may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While Wit of Mandate is revised on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. 

Blog Archives


Categories