Affirmative Defenses

Affirmative Defenses

Understanding Your Right to Raise a Defense

When any type of legal action is being taken against you – whether it be that you are being formally sued (i.e. served with a complaint, or counter-complaint or cross-complaint) or if you are the recipient of a notice of adverse action in public employment or you received an accusation seeking to revoke your license – you have a right to raise “affirmative defenses” that would defeat the claims of the party raising the claims or taking the action against you.

In particular, when answering a complaint, you must raise all possible affirmative defenses based upon known facts that you can raise at that time. If you fail to do so, the other side can oppose a tardy raising of the affirmative defense on the grounds that you waived it. In the event the affirmative defense is only discovered at a later time, then it can be properly added by way of amendment.

New facts need to be sufficiently pleaded to establish each element of a claimed affirmative defense. (Code Civ. Proc., § 431.30(b).) Thus, the rules for pleading that are so commonly used in demurrers to complaints are also applicable to demurrers to answers. (See e.g. Ostling v. Loring (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 1731, 33 [“Our system of code pleading requires only fact pleading.”); Butler vs. Wyman (1933) 128 Cal.App. 736, 740 [“It is a cardinal rule of pleading that every statement of fact must be direct and certain and not by way of inference”.].) Significantly, a pleading must allege facts and not mere legal conclusions. (Jones v. Grewe (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 950, 954.) Similarly, in federal court, Rule 11 requires that you have a good faith basis for believing an affirmative defense actually applies before pleading it, and in discovery you will likely need to respond to an interrogatory identifying all factual bases for every affirmative defense you plead.

In the vast majority of cases, the defendant/respondent bears the burden of proof regarding the claimed affirmative defense. However, some of the affirmative defenses are more properly styled “additional defenses” where the plaintiff/claimant bears the burden of proving that the defense does not apply (e.g. service of process).

Reference Guide

List of Affirmative Defenses

Below, please find a list of common affirmative defenses. This list is long. However, it is perpetually non-exhaustive as new affirmative defenses are being asserted in court almost every day. The list includes defenses from the state of California and the 9th circuit (federal). If you believe one is missing, please let us know by contacting us and it will be added. In addition, more detailed descriptions and explanations of each defense is forthcoming.

Please note that there will never be a case in which ALL of these defenses are appropriate. Rather, many are specific to circumstances where a particular cause of action has been pleaded.

Affirmative Defense Directory

Common Affirmative Defenses

Abandonment of Trademark
Accord and Satisfaction
Acquiescence
Act of God
Adequate Warning
Adhesion
Adverse Possession
Agency
Alteration of Product
Anticipatory Breach
Anticipatory Repudiation
Arbitration and Award
Assumption of Risk
Assumption of the Risk
At-Will Employment
Attorney Fees Are Not Recoverable
Bankruptcy Discharge
Bona Fide Purchaser for Value
Borrowed Servant
Breach By Plaintiff
Breach of Confidentiality Agreement
Breach of Contract
Breach of Express Warranty
Breach of Implied Warranty
Business Judgement Rule
Cancellation of Contract
Cardinal Change
Charitable Immunity
Circuitry of Action
Claimants Own Conduct, or By the Conduct of Its Agents, Representatives, and Consultants
Claim of Right
Collateral Source Rule
Comparative Fault of Third Parties
Complete Performance
Conditions Precedent
Consent (i.e. Express, Implied)
Contrary to Public Policy
Contribution
Contributory Negligence
Damages Were the Result of Unrelated, Pre-Existing, or Subsequent Conditions Unrelated to Defendant’s Conduct
Default By Plaintiff
Discharge
Discharge in Bankruptcy
Doctrine of Primary or Exclusive Jurisdiction
Doe Defendant Is Liable
Duress
Economic Loss Rule
Election of Parties
Election of Remedies
Estoppel
Equitable Estoppel
Equitable Tolling
Execution of Public Duty
Exemption
Failing to Plead Fraud with Particularity
Failure of Condition Precedent
Failure of Consideration
Failure to Act in a Commercially Reasonable Manner
Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies
Failure to Join an Indispensable Party
Failure to Mitigate Damages
Failure to Perform
Failure to Preserve Confidentiality
Failure to Serve
Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted
Failure to Take Advantage of Effective System to Report/stop Harassment (i.e. Faragher-Ellerth Doctrine)
Fair Use
False Claims
Filed Rate Doctrine
Fleeting and Incidental Use
Force Majeure
Fraud
Fraud in the Inducement
Free Speech
Frustration of Purpose
Good Faith
Good Faith By Answering Defendant
Hindrance of Contract
Ignorance of the Law
Illegality
Immunity
Implied Repeal of Statute
Impossibility
Improper Notice of Breach
Improper Service
Improper Venue
Indemnification
Injury By Fellow Servant
Innocent Infringement
Insanity
Intervening Cause
Joint Venture
Justification
Laches
Lack of Authority
Lack of Causal Relationship
Lack of Causation
Lack of Consent
Lack of Consideration
Lack of Equity
Lack of Privity
Lack of Standing
Learned Intermediary Doctrine
License
Manufacturing/Labeling/Marketing in Conformity with the State of the Art At the Time
Merger Doctrine
Misnomer of Parties
Mistake
Misuse of Product
Mutual Acquiescence in Boundary
Mutual Mistake
Mutual Mistake of Fact
Necessity
No Actual Injury
No Adequate Remedy At Law
No Damages
Noerr-Pennington Doctrine
No Evidence That Modified Warning Would Have Been Followed or Would Have
Prevented Injury
No Government Action
No Private Right of Action
No Privity
No Reliance
Novation
Offset
Parol Evidence Rule
Payment
Peril of the Sea
Preemption
Prevention and Frustration (defendant Was Ready, Willing and Able to Perform the Contract, and Plaintiff Prevented and Frustrated Such Performance)
Prevention of Performance
Prior Pending Action
Privilege
Product Provides Net Benefits for a Class of Patients
Product Was Unavoidably Unsafe
Punitive Damages Not Permissible
Ratification
Real Party in Interest
Reasonable Accommodation
Recoupment
Rejection of Goods
Release (i.e. Express, Implied, or Equitable Release of Rights)
Res Judicata
Restraint of Trade
Retraction
Revocation of Acceptance of Goods
Reservation of Right to Add Additional Affirmative Defenses
Safety of Employee
Same Decision Defense
Self Defense
Set Off
Sole Negligence of Co-Defendant
Sophisticated User Doctrine
Sovereign Immunity
Speculative Damages
Spoliation of Evidence
Statute of Frauds
Statute of Limitations
Statutory Compliance
Statutory Defenses Prerequisites
Statutory Immunity
Suicide
Supervening Cause
Termination of Employment
Truth
Truth in Lending Recoupmet
Unclean Hands
Unconscionability
Unconstitutional
Undue Burden
Undue Influence
Unjust Enrichment
Usury
Waiver
Wrong Party

Hopefully, this list will assist you in brainstorming the defense of your case. Or, in the alternative, it will serve as a check-list to review before finalizing your answer or responsive pleading.

Created by Dewi Novita Sarifrom Noun Project

Ready to discuss your legal matter?

Whether you are facing a licensing issue, employment dispute, administrative challenge, or another complex legal matter, our team is here to help you understand your options and determine the right next step.